Klarinet Archive - Posting 000206.txt from 2001/12

From: HatNYC62@-----.com
Subj: [kl] Re: Materials
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 10:52:43 -0500

In a message dated 12/9/01 4:12:59 AM, klarinet-digest-help@-----.org
writes:

<< I have Benade and have read certain portions of the book many times. I also
own Lee Gibson's book which is much less scientific and often haphazardly
written, in my opinion. He does offer some valuable information on the
development of clarinet bores and clarinet design.

As I read both of these recognized masters of instrumental acoustics I have
often wondered how much of their information is derived from theory and how
much from practical experience. Benade is beyond reproach in his thorough
scientific study of musical instruments and he was apparently a competent
amateur clarinetist (As was John Backus - a little easier to get through).
Gibson is a very accomplished clarinetist and acoustic dabbler. But, I doubt
that either of these men has made very many mouthpieces, barrels, bells or
instruments from the ground up. They lack the experience of the artisan. I
think of these men as masterful art critics that have analyzed the process
of painting down to the molecule, but have never produced a painting and
experienced the wonderful, organic process of art.
>>

Just to amplify Clark's point, I had the opportunity to try a Benade NX
clarinet (made by Stephen Fox). It was easily the worst sounding clarinet I
have ever played. Out of tune, too.

David Hattner, NYC
www.northbranchrecords.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------