Klarinet Archive - Posting 000732.txt from 2001/10

From: lubydjackson@-----. Jackson)
Subj: Re: [kl] Re: "successful faking"
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 01:16:08 -0400

True. I guess what I was asking is about "faking."
----- Original Message -----
From: "The Guy on the Couch" <jnohe@-----.Edu>
Subject: Re: [kl] Re: "successful faking"

> On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Luby D. Jackson wrote:
>
> > I've been reading the thread about faking and I would like to ask is
this
> > the same as making one's tone sound big and fat purposely when
ordinarily
> > one's tone is shrill and thin?
>
> Why would you even want a shrill, thin sound to begin with? Having a
> full, rich tone shouldn't be part of faking - it should be the way
> one plays, regardless.
>
> J. Shouryu Nohe
> Grad Assistant, New Mexico State University
> "I think we have a ghost in our house." - Kaycee Nicole
> "I should probably be playing Buffet." - Steve Moore
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------