Klarinet Archive - Posting 000260.txt from 2001/10

From: Josh <eliazor@-----.net>
Subj: Re: [kl] This list
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 18:56:01 -0400

It seems that we need to fous more on the clarinet other than putting up
with two jerks.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Oliver Seely" <oliver-seely@-----.net>
Subject: Re: [kl] This list

> I quite agree. When I was a listowner, the listserv software didn't allow
> me to block specific addresses from subscribing, so I had to rely on
giving
> the advice that we have a certain obligation to scholarship. It worked
> well until two people were not advised in any way by the subsequent
> listowner. The demise of the list followed over a period of about a year.
> Right now there are three suscribers and there hasn't been any activity
for
> a long time.
>
> Oliver
>
> At 03:23 PM 10/8/2001 -0700, you wrote:
> >In case it wasn't clear from my previous message, I don't think "a
> >transmission of the guidelines offline" is sufficient to stop flaming.
> >
> >Stewart Kiritz
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------