Klarinet Archive - Posting 000071.txt from 2001/09
From: Daniel Leeson <leeson0@-----.net> Subj: Re: [kl] instrument replacement - a question for Dan Leeson (andothers) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 22:37:49 -0400
You are not going to get an argument from me on that one. I am the
leading proponent of the argument that blow out is a pile of doo doo.
Dan
William Wright wrote:
>
> <><> Ann H Satterfield wrote:
> for the magic, perfect equipment
>
> I would carry this thread a step further by saying that my clarinet
> was cracked & pinned before I bought it. The previous owner still
> gives me a wistful smile when she hears it, and she says, "That _is_ a
> beautiful instrument. I feel that the 'magic' is gone from it.... but
> if ever you quit playing, I'd like to buy it back from you...."
>
> My point is that if a clarinet can be cracked and pinned (which is a
> major repair) and yet it still sounds beautiful, it's hard to imagine
> how mere sound waves and swabbing could destroy it.
>
> Cheers,
> Bill, who played an extra hour today because music seems to be the
> only thing that shuts up the =#$%^!! yapping dog who lives next door
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
***************************
** Dan Leeson **
** leeson0@-----.net **
***************************
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|