Klarinet Archive - Posting 000243.txt from 2001/07

From: "David C. Kumpf" <dkumpf@-----.com>
Subj: RE: [kl] Speaking of mouthpieces...
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 02:53:31 -0400

I'm curious as to whether you published this work on mouthpieces. If you
measured enough mouthpieces of each example, some rudimentary statistical
analysis of the measurement results might be illuminating...(or not...can't
tell until it's done).

David C. Kumpf
President
Optimetra, Inc.
mailto:dkumpf@-----.com
http://www.optimetra.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rgarrett@-----.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 12:53 AM
> To: klarinet@-----.org
> Subject: RE: [kl] Speaking of mouthpieces...
>
> The Vandoren line was a hoot. I found that most mouthpieces in the same
> model did not measure the same. Some of this was due to slight
> variances,
> but most of it was so far off that I wondered if perhaps some of them had
> been stamped incorrectly. The B45 measured anywere from 1.13 to 1.18 tip
> opening - often leaning towards the latter. Pretty interesting
> considering
> the 1.15 measurement it was supposed to be.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org
Subscribe to the Digest: klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org
Additional commands: klarinet-help@-----.org
Other problems: klarinet-owner@-----.org