Klarinet Archive - Posting 000083.txt from 2001/07

From: Roger Shilcock <roger.shilcock@-----.uk>
Subj: Re: [kl] Hearing loss in kids
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 05:58:28 -0400

People on the political Right in the UK refer to this sort of legislation
as being a facet of the "Nanny State" - evidence of their own elitist paternalism,
of course....
"Never discuss politics or religion at dinner," my Daddy told me.
(Who's eating?)
Roger S.

In message <200107030903.f6393aE18086@-----.org writes:
> As someone told to me, in the US there are very strong laws/rules
> concerning smoking in public (sometimes very extreme in my opinion). I
> understand the health argument. But in my opinion loud noises are much
> more disturbing and straight health damaging than the smoke of a
> cigarette. So, why not being consequent and introducing similarly
> strong rules concerning loud noises? Just my opinion...
>
> Dirk
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org
> Subscribe to the Digest: klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org
> Additional commands: klarinet-help@-----.org
> Other problems: klarinet-owner@-----.org
>
>

--
For our own past is covered by the currents of action,
But the torment of others remains an experience
Unqualified, unworn by subsequent attrition.
People change, and smile: but the agony remains.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org
Subscribe to the Digest: klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org
Additional commands: klarinet-help@-----.org
Other problems: klarinet-owner@-----.org