Klarinet Archive - Posting 000497.txt from 2001/06

From: Shouryunus Sarcasticii <jnohe@-----.Edu>
Subj: Re: [kl] Triplet Notation
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 14:43:17 -0400

On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, William Wright wrote:

> For me, the first way.
>
> But as a side issue, would breaking the beam between the triplet and the
> final 1/8-note be sinful, perhaps with a slur that includes all four
> 1/8-notes in order to emphasize that they are to be considered a single
> figure?

Personally, I'd have to agree with Bill here, on both counts. The first
is most clearest, but if I were notating it myself, I'd have broken the
beam between the triplet and the "third" eighth.

J. Shouryu Nohe
http://web.nmsu.edu/~jnohe
Professor of SarCaSM102, New Mexico State Univ.
"I think we have a ghost in our house." - Kaycee Nicole

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org
Subscribe to the Digest: klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org
Additional commands: klarinet-help@-----.org
Other problems: klarinet-owner@-----.org