Klarinet Archive - Posting 000471.txt from 2001/06

From: Tony@-----.uk (Tony Pay)
Subj: Re: [kl] Triplet Notation
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 18:22:07 -0400

On Sat, 16 Jun 2001 15:18:54 -0700, whitco@-----.net said:

> For those interested, I have a question regarding triplet notation.

FWIW, I think the first is the clearest.

*Not* because it's the most unequivocal, but because it most clearly
represents the musical intention.

The other notations might generate more accurate playing; but those who
responded to those other notations and couldn't interpret the first
representation wouldn't be producing what you want anyway.

Tony
--
_________ Tony Pay
|ony:-) 79 Southmoor Rd Tony@-----.uk
| |ay Oxford OX2 6RE GMN artist: http://www.gmn.com
tel/fax 01865 553339

... Never take a beer to a job interview.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org
Subscribe to the Digest: klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org
Additional commands: klarinet-help@-----.org
Other problems: klarinet-owner@-----.org