Klarinet Archive - Posting 000023.txt from 2001/06
From: Richard Bush <rbushidioglot@-----.com> Subj: Re: [kl] Mouthpiece table Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 00:30:29 -0400
Dear William,
After reading the original post again from Walter, I agree there is reason
for confusion, even if one understands the difference between concave and
convex.
I'm sure that "How did the concavity get there?' was a short, momentary
brain fart from him.
Walter? Is an addendum in order? I think I understood the gist of your post,
but it is best that YOU clear it up.
William Wright wrote:
> Some of us are confused because the original post included both "convex"
> and "concave":
>
> <><> [snip] The table had a convex surface. [snip] But....
> How did the concavity get there?
>
> Cheers,
> Bill
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org
Subscribe to the Digest: klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org
Additional commands: klarinet-help@-----.org
Other problems: klarinet-owner@-----.org
|
|
|