Klarinet Archive - Posting 000230.txt from 2001/04

From: "Gordon Palmer" <gordp@-----.nz>
Subj: [kl] Pads: Single versus Double Bladder
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 05:09:52 -0400

I import my clarinet pads from Music Supplies in Italy, "the worlds largest
pad maker". One of their lines is "Mypads", which I think US imports. In
fact many of the pads in US probably come from this supplier. Their range
includes "single thick bladder" along with the more common "double bladder."

Many years ago I did some measuring and found the single bladder to be about
1.5 times thicker than the membrane doubled on the double bladder pads. I
wondered which was preferable.

Let's assume that the pads are not going to be wrecked by zealous wiping of
them or abrasion at the edges. Through normal use the first sign of of pad
'death' is a cut or small hole along the 'seal circle'. When this first
starts on a clarinet the pad still seals on the tone hole because a
significant area is in contact with the timber. The first problem that is
likely to emerge is that the pad absorbs water through the cut or hole,
swells, and stops sealing on account of this swelling. However this water
absorption is the first problem with a dying pad only for SINGLE bladder
pads....

When the first layer of a DOUBLE membrane pad cuts through the loose
membrane tends to wave about in the vibrating air, vibrating against the
tone hole as the key is opened, and maybe still vibrating against the second
layer when the key is open. This can happen even though the second membrane
is making a good seal when the pad is closed. My point here is that there is
effectively only one thin layer to damage before the pad needs replacing.

So the original question becomes: Which is preferable:

a). A double bladder pad that effectively is dead when the first THIN skin
cuts through.
b) . A single THICK bladder pad that dies when the THICK skin is first
punctured and absorbs water.

Because the thick bladder presumably takes considerably longer to puncture
than a thin bladder, the single bladder pad could be expected to last longer
than the double bladder pad.

I therefore made my decision to use single thick bladders and have not
regretted it. The pads I use last for many years.

I would be interested if there is something I have missed in making this
decision. There must surely be some valid reason why double bladder pads
have caught on as the standard. Or is it just that the name makes them SOUND
as if they would be better.

I might add that it seems even some top makers are lowering themselves to
sometimes using very thin, brittle, single bladder pads which die in a year
or two.

Gordon

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org
Subscribe to the Digest: klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org
Additional commands: klarinet-help@-----.org
Other problems: klarinet-owner@-----.org

   
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org