Klarinet Archive - Posting 001328.txt from 2000/12

From: Daniel Leeson <leeson0@-----.net>
Subj: Re: [kl] Re: Wagner vs Strauss
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 14:45:00 -0500

You have not answered my question. What did you mean by the final
sentence in your posting? It reads: "Condemnation by association ...
ABSOLUTELY!" I simply do not understand what you meant by this. Please
explain, and without the sarcasm too.

"cpaok@-----.net" wrote:
>
> Dan, it was you who made comparison of underwear to Nazis.
>
> I think you are the one who is being *overly* presumptive. Obviously, your
> talents extend to evaluation of writing style, too? Perhaps you can tell my
> age from tea leaves as well?
>
> mw
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daniel Leeson" <leeson0@-----.net>
> To: <klarinet>
> Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 11:58 AM
> Subject: [kl] Re: Wagner vs Strauss
>
> > Mark Weinstein wrote:
> >
> > "Surely you jest? You wish to compare underwear content & Nazi behavior?
> >
> > Please save your expensive words. Those who were Nazis & Anti-Semitic
> > had a common bond which was a single thread --- HATE. Give your
> > explanations & rationalizations for the 6 million & their survivors.
> >
> > You are welcome to rationalize Strauss' (or other musician's behavior)
> > in whatever manner suits you. However, I am _NOT_ swallowing any of it.
> >
> > Condemnation by association ... ABSOLUTELY!"
> >
> > First: Mark, I do not understand this last sentence. Please explain
> > what you mean.
> >
> > Second: If your response to a posting is to make negative reference to
> > the writing style (as you have done above), I must question both your
> > objectivity when speaking about such matters as well as the depth of
> > your statement.
> >
> > Third: I lived through the period of the Holocaust and, judging from
> > your writing style, I suspect that you are too young to have had that
> > unpleasant experience, one for which you should be very grateful.
> > Therefore, do not presume that my understanding of this subject is not
> > equivalent to yours. It may be significantly better.
> > --
> > ***************************
> > ** Dan Leeson **
> > ** leeson0@-----.net **
> > ***************************
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org
> > Subscribe to the Digest: klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org
> > Additional commands: klarinet-help@-----.org
> > Other problems: klarinet-owner@-----.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org
> Subscribe to the Digest: klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org
> Additional commands: klarinet-help@-----.org
> Other problems: klarinet-owner@-----.org

--
***************************
** Dan Leeson **
** leeson0@-----.net **
***************************

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org
Subscribe to the Digest: klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org
Additional commands: klarinet-help@-----.org
Other problems: klarinet-owner@-----.org