Klarinet Archive - Posting 001325.txt from 2000/12

From: "DAVID S. NADEN" <dnaden@-----.edu>
Subj: RE: [kl] Re: Wlach the Nazi?
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 14:09:02 -0500

Prof. Levin-

I beg to differ. There is a distinct difference between being anti-semetic
and a Nazi. Referring to Wlach as anti-semetic as opposed to a Nazi does in
no way
justify his actions. HOWEVER, the difference to being anti-semetic vs. a
Nazi is this: The Nazis were not only anti-semetic, but hell bent on the
destruction
and total elimination of all European Jews. While most anti-semetics do not
like anything Jewish, most are not as blatant as to the destruction of
Jewery and
the genocide of what was then 10+ million European Jews.

David S. Naden

-----Original Message-----
From: Allen J. Levin [mailto:alevin@-----.net]
Subject: RE: [kl] Re: Wlach the Nazi?

I'm having trouble with the semantics of this thread. Wlach's conduct was
reprehensible. Calling him "merely" anti-semitic rather than a Nazi is
some sick attempt to justify it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org
Subscribe to the Digest: klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org
Additional commands: klarinet-help@-----.org
Other problems: klarinet-owner@-----.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org
Subscribe to the Digest: klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org
Additional commands: klarinet-help@-----.org
Other problems: klarinet-owner@-----.org