Klarinet Archive - Posting 001113.txt from 2000/12
From: "Kevin Fay (LCA)" <kevinfay@-----.com> Subj: RE: [kl] Julius Baker vs. Zoon Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 19:28:49 -0500
gtg noted:
<<<I, like DH, wasn't going to reply to this gross, blown out of proportion,
put words in my mouth, misinterpretation of my email I sent out about the
great Julius Baker (who I happen to love, just not as much as Jaques Zoon).
Zoon is considered by many to be the greatest flutist out there today . . .
Please let me know if I ever said Baker sucked, or I didn't like him... or,
great technique doesn't matter. I'm sure I didn't write anything between
the lines. Maybe too much eggnog on your part!>>>
I'm terribly sorry if I misinterpreted your intent, but your actual post
stated that Julius Baker
<<<. . . and his clones phrase like metronomes also! Technical perfection
is only great when it's used as a tool to express something musical.
So therefore, I graciously disagree about Baker being one of the best wind
virtuosos. To me, that would
mean having it all: style, ample technique, taste, musicianship, ears,
flexibility, etc. That's not to say I don't appreciate a technical freak
every so often, just as long as they aren't boring! Give me Zoon any day...
missed notes and all. Only my opinion. :)>>>
To be sure, you did not say that Julius Baker "sucked." What we read were
your own words stating that, in your opinion, Mr. Baker and/or his "clones":
-- "phrases like [a] metronome";
-- does *not* have all of "style, ample technique, taste, musicianship,
ears, flexibility, etc.";
-- is a "technical freak"; and
-- is "boring."
Again, if I jumped to a conclusion, please forgive me. But it's certainly
reasonable how a person could take this the wrong way.
kjf
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org
Subscribe to the Digest: klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org
Additional commands: klarinet-help@-----.org
Other problems: klarinet-owner@-----.org
|
|
|