Klarinet Archive - Posting 000253.txt from 2000/11

From: "Tony Wakefield" <tony-wakefield@-----.net>
Subj: Re: [kl] Decrescendo v Diminuendo
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 19:20:03 -0500

Tony here again Annie,
I`m sure you agree that there are 1000`s of words which sound horrible, yet
we have to use some of them. Yes, it`s a topic not directly linked to the
clarinet - but then again it is - sort of.
All I`m doing is relating what my feelings are towards "that" word, a word
which I feel has a better alternative, a better understanding, without
misunderstanding, in the heat of the moment whilst playing. I`m not trying
to ram this down your throat, I`m not yelling at you or anybody, and I am to
being a genius, as what Bush is to sober driving. All I am doing is putting
forward my point of view, which you may certainly challenge. I welcome it.
That`s why I`m here. What you perhaps may have interpreted as yelling, (by
me?) was in fact my tongue in cheek approach to internet argument
instigation, if you can understand that perhaps silly phrase, (cos it`s
12.15 am here in UK, and I can`t sit around all night trying to find a
better one).

I`m sorry you missed your swimming lesson. Should I be flattered that you
had the interest to reply?!?! :<) Please be assured that I respect your
point of view. It`s just that mine is different.
I do hope you may continue to contribute "to and froing" our different(?)
points of view - different topics of course. I find that interesting, (when
I`ve got the time).

Finally, what you do say about "crescendo into a soft tone and then fade
away" does have me foxed a little, I must admit. If I re-phrase it this
way, - "crescendo, and then fade away into a soft tone", would I be near
what you originally meant?

And finally finally, we have discovered a "louden" in music written by
Vaughn Williams?, thanks to Ed Lacy.
I think this is also a horrible word. It means what it says, and says what
it means, it`s just that I think there are
better alternatives, which you have the full right to challenge.
Best Wishes,
Tony W.

----- Original Message -----
From: Anne Lenoir <AnneLenoir@-----.net>
Subject: Re: [kl] Decrescendo v Diminuendo

> Sorry Audrey. Annie here again. I'm so confused I can't understand who
> is saying what about "decrescendo", a word which has now been eliminated
> from my consciousness. It is a distracting word which causes people to
> get into stupid arguments instead of practicing harder for dynamic
> control. I was trying to get out of the house and mail Terry's
> "Long-tone" sheet to him and then get to my grand daughter's swimming
> lesson, clainet lesson and piano lesson. I got so distracted by all the
> postings of "decrescendo" that we missed the swimming lesson, because my
> attention became "diminished" or I won't even bother to make a word play
> on "diminuendo" as some genius will pick that to pieces for another
> week. ANNIE

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org
Subscribe to the Digest: klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org
Additional commands: klarinet-help@-----.org
Other problems: klarinet-owner@-----.org

   
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org