Klarinet Archive - Posting 000242.txt from 2000/09

From: "Mark Charette" <charette@-----.org>
Subj: Re: [kl] Attachments/California/Mark
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 07:44:27 -0400

From: "Tony Wakefield" <tony-wakefield@-----.net>
> What I did notice tho` is that the copyright will most probably have
> expired, the date on the bottom of the sheet being 1924.

1923 is safe. 1924 is a maybe - 25% of the copyrights were renewed. If it's
an English copyright then I have no idea - I only try & keep up w/ American
copyright law.

> Would it be a thought Mark, for it to be generally known to klarinetters,
> (if it`s not already) that we must not communicate in this manner within
> klarinet.

I think it's generally known since the virus topic comes up regularly & I
let it be known that all the messages are filtered for attachments. The
problem lies in the fact that if I filtered _all_ attachments we'd lose
valid messages (since people attach text/plain and some other which are
perfectly valid).

I don't incur extra cost since Sneezy's connection line is provided gratis
from a newspaper company, but it does use up a portion of the bandwidth
available for other things. If I were paying, many companies do charge for
transmission of bytes past some agreed upon floor. They don't care what or
how - they just charge you. Current Sneezy sends about 20Gb a month through
the Internet from both the list (2.5 Gb) and the Web server (17.5 Gb).

In the case of pictures or music that people would like to distribute I can
be contacted and set up either a Web page or what we call an
"autoresponder" - an email robot which will send out the information
on-demand.

Tony - I know it wasn't on purpose. No damage done.

Cheers,
Mark C.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org
Subscribe to the Digest: klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org
Additional commands: klarinet-help@-----.org
Other problems: klarinet-owner@-----.org