Klarinet Archive - Posting 001044.txt from 2000/02

From: VGuerra276@-----.com
Subj: [kl] Re: klarinet Digest 27 Feb 2000 09:15:01 -0000 Issue 2071
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 11:02:42 -0500

In a message dated 2/27/2000 3:08:49 AM Central Standard Time,
klarinet-digest-help@-----.org writes:

<<
I have recently found myself displeased with my Rovner because of a =
perceived deadness is the tone. Because of this I tried the BG and the =
Optimum. I liked both of these ligatures very much, but could not =
justify the cost. Therefore, I went back to my standard Bonade. After =
a discussion with my teacher I decided to try the inverted Bonade and =
found that was everything I was looking for in a ligature with a price =
that I could live with. Since I am presently going through a mouthpiece =
trial I have to use the Rovner because the inverted Bonade appears to =
put scratches on the Mouthpiece. Once I make my final determination on =
the mouthpiece I intend to make the Bonade my standard ligature.
>>
greg smith recommends the inverted bonade with his mouthpieces but states
that a good inverted bonade is hard to come by because they are not always
shaped correctly. can anyone tell me the difference between the inverted
bonade and the mitchell lurie springboard?
thanks
vicky

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org
Subscribe to the Digest: klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org
Additional commands: klarinet-help@-----.org
Other problems: klarinet-owner@-----.org