Klarinet Archive - Posting 000959.txt from 1999/11

From: "Ed Maurey" <edsshop@-----.ca>
Subj: Re: [kl] Re: [K] Robert Marcellus And The Long B?
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 10:14:15 -0500

"The bell as tone hole." I'll add that one to my list of explanations for
that slight step between the bell and lower joint. It sounds reasonable.
Thankyou.

Before 1960 Selmer had no "choke" at the bell. After 1960 they did and it
feels about the same as a Buffet's.

Ed Maurey
-----Original Message-----
From: DPhilpot@-----.com>
Date: Tuesday, November 23, 1999 9:29 PM
Subject: Re: [kl] Re: [K] Robert Marcellus And The Long B?

>My understanding is that the bell bore is not supposed to be level with the
>bore of the bottom section...this is similar to fraising of a tone hole
since
>in a sense the bell becomes the tone hole for B and low E. Before doing
any
>boring out of the bell without a plan in mind, it would be better to send
it
>to someone like Swiney or at least see what Buffet says about bell bore
size.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org
>Subscribe to the Digest: klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org
>Additional commands: klarinet-help@-----.org
>Other problems: klarinet-owner@-----.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org
Subscribe to the Digest: klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org
Additional commands: klarinet-help@-----.org
Other problems: klarinet-owner@-----.org