Klarinet Archive - Posting 000565.txt from 1999/05
From: Roger Garrett <rgarrett@-----.edu> Subj: Re: [kl] Tone Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 17:17:13 -0400
At 03:21 PM 5/13/99 EDT, you wrote:
>In a message dated 13/05/99 12:59:42PM, you write:
>
><< No, it **ISN'T** every clarinetist's goal to get a "dark" tone. We
> strive for a full, even, clear sound. Frankly, to me "dark"= DULL (in my
> own not-so-humble opinon). >>
>
>Thank you for your email, you beat me to it. I couldn't agree more with you
>I think dark also equals dull.
Now.........it is clear to me, not dark any more, or fuzzy, bright, or ?
why Dan has a problem with this adjective!
Roger Garrett
Professor of Clarinet
Director, Concert Band/Symphonic Winds/Titan Band
Advisor, Recording Studio
Illinois Wesleyan University
Office: (309) 556-3268
Fax: (309) 556-3411
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org
Subscribe to the Digest: klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org
Additional commands: klarinet-help@-----.org
Other problems: klarinet-owner@-----.org
|
|
|