Klarinet Archive - Posting 000510.txt from 1999/04
From: Rich Gordley <rgordley@-----.com> Subj: [kl] excessive bandwidth wastage Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 15:50:47 -0400
In a message dated 4/9/99 10:09:47 PM, you wrote:
<<he name of the sender is on every message - can't miss catching it>>
The reason I said that I wasn't sure who sent the original message is that I
had accidently deleted the original email before I had a chance to send mine
out. I actually did miss it and I'm not sure what you meant by saying "can't
miss catching it" I'm puzzled and it seems like a strange point to bring up.
Jeez....let it go already....as they say in court "asked and answered"
><<There were two parts to the question, if you
>remember - "who's the instructor at Duke?" (easy) and "can anyone
>recommend a teacher" (not so easy). I _am_ suggesting that people do the
>easy part themselves if at all possible.>>
>So it would have been better for that person to only ask the latter of the
>two questions? It seems to me a really natural question to ask. A very
>large number of the questions asked on this list can be answered by doing
>research on the internet. Does this mean that they shouldn't be asked?
>JC
Rich Gordley
rgordley@-----.com
.......Ya doesn't has to call me Johnson!
http://wwp.icq.com/13397915
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from Klarinet, e-mail: klarinet-unsubscribe@-----.org
Subscribe to the Digest: klarinet-digest-subscribe@-----.org
Additional commands: klarinet-help@-----.org
Other problems: klarinet-owner@-----.org
|
|
|