Klarinet Archive - Posting 000772.txt from 1998/11

From: Roger Shilcock <roger.shilcock@-----.uk>
Subj: Re: [kl] Two specific questions on reeds
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 08:18:06 -0500

------@-----.037B81E0
Content-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.95.981120085738.21045D@-----.uk>

Presumably the resulting change of contour is the significant thing,
rather than the actual thickness.
Roger Shilcock

On Fri, 20 Nov 1998, Hiroshi Nagatsuma wrote:

> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 09:34:47 +0900
> From: Hiroshi Nagatsuma <hiroshi@-----.jp>
> Reply-To: klarinet@-----.org
> To: klarinet@-----.org
> Subject: [kl] Two specific questions on reeds
>
> I have a specific question about reeds:reed-heel thickness.
> French clarinettiste Guy Danguin saids in his book that standard reed heel
> thickness is 2.8 mm(0.1102") but that if its thickness bemes 3mm(0.1181")
> the tones become more rounder. Dit anyone experience this phenomena
> actually? Do anyone know any commercialy available reeds which have heel
> thickness larger than 2.8mm?
>
>

------@-----.037B81E0
Content-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.95.981120085738.21045E@-----.uk>
Content-Description:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

------@-----.037B81E0

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
------@-----.037B81E0--

   
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org