| Klarinet Archive - Posting 001382.txt from 1998/07 From: "Arnold Teres" <johnathant@-----.com>Subj: [kl] Re: klarinet Digest 30 Jul 1998 08:15:02 -0000 Issue 347
 Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 18:39:33 -0400
 
 Bill Hausman wrote:
 
 <And in exactly WHICH Shakespeare work does the word F*** appear?  There is
 a subtle difference between bawdy and lewd which has been lost lately.>
 
 Well you got me - sort of - In McBeth the Porter scene (I think it's at the
 begining of act 2) has a character suggesting that he would rather be
 knocking the women than listening to someone else knocking on the door.
 Granted, this is not the F*** word but the intent is clear. You are correct
 in your comment regarding the difference between bawdy and lewd but I'll
 stand by my statement that the other authors I mentioned WERE lewd. My point
 is that lewd is commonplace and not anything new.
 
 Steven Goldman wrote:
 
 <Surely you have confused suggestive or titillating for crass and lewd. The
 former takes wit, the latter just hormones>
 
 I agree that you have a good distinction between suggestive and lewd but my
 point is that the authors and pieces I mentioned WERE lewd. Read the Nun's
 Priest's tale in Chaucer - he has a murdered little boy "floating amoungst
 the turds" in a cesspool. In the Miller's tale a wife farts in her husbands
 face and later he is burnt in the arse by a hot poker. Chaucer also has
 young lovers fornicating in a tree while an old husband watches. I think
 this goes a bit beyond suggestive. Mark Twains 1601 starts with a farting
 contest and goes downhill  from there - and it goes pretty far down hill!
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
 |