Klarinet Archive - Posting 000284.txt from 1998/01

From: Roger Shilcock <roger.shilcock@-----.uk>
Subj: Re: Hindemith Quintet
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 1998 08:19:28 -0500

I'm sure your impression is correct. There seems to have been a partly
private Kleine Kammermusik thread which has suddenly surfaced - at least,
this could be an explanation.
Anyway, they are quite different works. There are also other "Kleine
Kammermusik"en, of which I know virtually nothing.
Roger Shilcock

On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Edwin V. Lacy wrote:

> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 1998 15:24:25 -0600 (CST)
> From: "Edwin V. Lacy" <el2@-----.edu>
> Reply-To: klarinet@-----.us
> To: klarinet <klarinet@-----.us>
> Subject: Re: Hindemith Quintet
>
> On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Mark Charette wrote:
>
> > Jacqueline Eastwood wrote:
> > > Actually, I believe it's Kleine Kammermusik (with a "k", not a "c") fur
> > > (Umlaut over the "u") funf blaser. Because we used to sing the title
> > > along to the rhythm of the first movement opening motive. Yeah, I know it
> > > sounds weird.......
> >
> > At least one scholarly reference is wrong, since that's where I get the
> > material :) I'll correct it.
>
> Aren't we getting two different quintets mixed up here? The Kleine
> Kammermusik for wind quintet does not call for Eb clarinet in one of its
> movements, as far as I know. At least, I have never seen it performed
> that way.
>
> I was under the impression that there is another quintet, for clarinet and
> strings, and that that was the one which contained such a requirement for
> the clarinetist.
>
> Help?????
>
> Ed Lacy
> el2@-----.edu
>
>