Klarinet Archive - Posting 000794.txt from 1997/12

From: "Dan Leeson: LEESON@-----.edu>
Subj: Re: The Morales/Clemence of Titus question
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 14:59:05 -0500

> From: MX%"klarinet@-----.95
> Subj: Re: The Morales/Clemence of Titus question

> Gosh, I don't see the word "horn" anywhere in the post you quoted
> Dan......so, I don't understand your note......are you suggesting that the
> word basset is implying basset horn? Or, is it possible that the note
> implied basset clarinet?
>
> Roger Garrett
> IWU

Gee, Roger. We are now four levels of not understanding deep.

I didn't understand the original. You didn't understand mine. And
now, in turn, I don't understand yours, unless you intended it to
be cryptic. In which case, I do understand in my lack of
understanding. Do you now understand?

>
> On Tue, 16 Dec 1997, Dan Leeson: LEESON@-----.edu wrote:
>
> > > From: MX%"klarinet@-----.78
> > > Subj: Re: The Morales/Clemence of Titus question
> >
> > > I just E-mailed Ricardo and should soon get an answer of why he or his
> > > conductor performed on the normal Bb instead of the basset.
> >
> > I don't understand this note. The work cannot be done effectively
> > on the basset horn (if this is what the writer meant), and no one
> > was suggesting that this was a way to get around the impediment of
> > not having a basset clarinet in B-flat.
> >
> > Was the note's author mixing up basset horn and basset clarinet?
> >
> >
> >
> > =======================================
> > Dan Leeson, Los Altos, California
> > Rosanne Leeson, Los Altos, California
> > leeson@-----.edu
> > =======================================
> >
>
=======================================
Dan Leeson, Los Altos, California
Rosanne Leeson, Los Altos, California
leeson@-----.edu
=======================================