Klarinet Archive - Posting 000023.txt from 1997/07

From: Roger Shilcock <roger.shilcock@-----.uk>
Subj: Re: I'm sorry
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 15:03:49 -0400

Wouldn't basset clarinet tone be too *dark*?????????????
Only kidding - maybe.
Roger Shilcock

On Tue, 1 Jul 1997, Dan Leeson: LEESON@-----.edu wrote:

> Date: Tue, 01 Jul 1997 05:15:07 EDT
> From: "Dan Leeson: LEESON@-----.edu>
> To: klarinet@-----.us
> Subject: Re: I'm sorry
>
> What I have done with respect to this disgusting and obscene message
> is to send a copy of it to the postmaster of this account. Depending
> on who runs that node, nothing will happen or the guy will lose his
> account. That is really all one can do at the current state of
> technology in Internet. Whenever some babbling moron decides to
> be disgusting, how the recipient reacts is very important. It's
> somewhat like an obscene phone call. That kind of sick mind is
> fed or starved by your reaction.
>
> We've spent too much time on this ignoramus. Let's get on to
> something interesting like clarinets made out of bubble gum
> material or smoked salmon flavored reeds or ... (let me think),
> the introduction of the basset clarinet as a player's regular
> orchestral instrument. Now how would that be? You show up
> at a gig with basset clarinets in A and B-flat (the basset
> clarinet in C happens to not be required tonight) and use
> them as your regular clarinets???
>
>
> =======================================
> Dan Leeson, Los Altos, California
> Rosanne Leeson, Los Altos, California
> leeson@-----.edu
> =======================================
>

   
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org