Klarinet Archive - Posting 000877.txt from 1997/05

From: "Dan Leeson: LEESON@-----.edu>
Subj: RE: A clarinet
Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 11:42:01 -0400

> From: MX%"klarinet@-----.59
> Subj: RE: A clarinet

> Gary Young wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >Here's a further point. I'm not sure what to make of it. In Fundamentals
> >of Musical Acoustics, at p. 488, Arthur Benade writes: "Figure 22.9 shows
> >the variation of cutoff frequency across the low register scales of several
> >clarinets. For reference purposes, the curves for both A and B flat
> >Boehm-system clarinets are drawn with heavy lines. One can clearly see the
> >close correlation between the darker tone color and lowered f [with
> >subscript c] of the A clarinet relative to its B flat brother." [Figure
> >22.9 is at p. 489. The rest of this passage is well worth reading.]
> > Benade thinks there is a sonic difference between A and B flat cls., that
> >this sonic difference correlates with (= is explained by or is identical
> >to?) differences in cutoff frequency, and that when we say that one cl. has
> >a "darker" sound than another, we are responding to this difference in
> >cutoff frequency. If so, then this suggests there is an objective basis
> >for the use of the term "dark" to describe clarinet sounds, and that Dan's
> >impressive array of evidence to the contrary, taken from this very listserv
> >(see his article on sneezy), must have some other explanation. (But what
> >other explanation could there be than Dan's?) (Maybe someone versed in
> >physics, like Jonathan Cohler, could shed some light on this.) (I hope I'm
> >not covering old ground in this paragraph -- I must admit I didn't take
> >time to check the archives for earlier discussions of this point.)
>
> Gary,
>
> I have, indeed, posted many messages on this subject in the past. By the
> way, it is not a matter of whether Mr. Benade "thinks" as you said above.
> All of the work you refer to above by him was extensively experimentally
> verified.
>
> There is no question that higher cutoff frequency = "brighter" and lower
> cutoff frequency @-----.
>
> That does not, however, define what a "nice dark sound" is.
>
> Also, in this regard (as I have posted in the past), most of the C
> clarinets from around Beethoven's time were actually *darker* (lower
> cutoff) than today's modern Bb clarinets (as is also shown in Benade's
> diagram that you mention above). Therefore, if the argument is that the
> composer is going for tone character when he chooses a particular clarinet,
> it would actually be closer to the composers wishes to use a modern A
> clarinet to play Beethoven period C clarinet parts.

It's an easy thing to say, but where is the evidence that establishes
that the C clarinets were "*darker*" than today's B-flat clarinet?
How many Beethoven era clarinets were measured for cutoff frequency?
Where is this study published? Who is in support of it?

I offer the suggestion that the main sonic characteristics of a
clarinet derive from the length of the tube and the cylindrical nature
of the bore. Other factors that have an uncertain influence on the
character of the sound include the media (boxwood/blackwood), and
perhaps even the mouthpiece.

Finally, I note with great pleasure you statement that all of this
important scientific data does not tell use what that "nice dark
sound" is or how I, as a player, can get that thing; i.e., what
do I do with my mouth, body, nose, teeth, belly, etc. to improve
the "darkness" quality?

Are you really sure that darker (=higher cutoff freqency_ and brighter
(= lower cutoff frequency) has been conclusively proven? Or is that
there is a difference in character of sound between high and low
cutoff frequencies, but that difference does not fall in the realm
of what is generally referred to as "dark" and "bright" whatever
they mean in the first place?

>
> How about them apples?!
>
> ------------------
> Jonathan Cohler
> cohler@-----.net
>
>
=======================================
Dan Leeson, Los Altos, California
Rosanne Leeson, Los Altos, California
leeson@-----.edu
=======================================

   
     Copyright © Woodwind.Org, Inc. All Rights Reserved    Privacy Policy    Contact charette@woodwind.org