Klarinet Archive - Posting 000965.txt from 1997/03

From: "David C. Blumberg" <reedman@-----.COM>
Subj: Re: Stravinsk's Three Pieces--the second piece
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 1997 19:41:09 -0500

In the case of the mvt. of the piece in question, its one heck of a long
measure....

At 09:36 PM 3/27/97 LCL, Frauke Nonnenmacher wrote:
>On Wed 26 Mar 97 (18:33:27), kathi@-----.com wrote:
>> The second piece of Stravinsky's Three Pieces has no time
>> signiture or measures. When there is an accidental would this only
>> affect the note it proceeds? Or since there are no measures do I play
>> that note flat/sharp untill a natural sign appears? Thanks in advanced
>> for your help!
>
>I think it's the standard procedure: An accidental is valid for one bar and
>not longer. I've never come across a piece that didn't follow this rule.
>
>(Notes tied across bars excepted, of course)
>
>
>Hope that helps,
>
>Frauke
>
>In 1869 the waffle iron was invented for people who had wrinkled waffles.
>
>--
>Frauke (fat.cat@-----.uk)
>WWW: http://www.argonet.co.uk/users/fat.cat/
>
>
David C. Blumberg
Principal Clarinet Riverside Symphonia
reedman@-----.com