Klarinet Archive - Posting 000918.txt from 1997/03

From: Peter Salveson <dsalveso@-----.NET>
Subj: Re: Stravinsk's Three Pieces--the second piece
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 22:49:58 -0500

Well, in monologue by someone or other it's the same situation. One
really long measure, there's a note that says that one is to play the
accidentals only on the notes directly after them. But then again this
is a contemporary piece and so I'm not sure if that helps you.

dsalveso@-----.net

On Thu, 27 Mar 1997, Frauke Nonnenmacher wrote:

> On Wed 26 Mar 97 (18:33:27), kathi@-----.com wrote:
> > The second piece of Stravinsky's Three Pieces has no time
> > signiture or measures. When there is an accidental would this only
> > affect the note it proceeds? Or since there are no measures do I play
> > that note flat/sharp untill a natural sign appears? Thanks in advanced
> > for your help!
>
> I think it's the standard procedure: An accidental is valid for one bar and
> not longer. I've never come across a piece that didn't follow this rule.
>
> (Notes tied across bars excepted, of course)
>
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> Frauke
>
> In 1869 the waffle iron was invented for people who had wrinkled waffles.
>
> --
> Frauke (fat.cat@-----.uk)
> WWW: http://www.argonet.co.uk/users/fat.cat/
>